🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

In Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "robbing our children's childhood". The policy may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked parliament to enact a law raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised guardians to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is granted. While it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," commented the MEP supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government committed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and suitable for young users," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures requiring adult authorization for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to copy this example, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more measured position. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this global conversation continues, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are less and less willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.